On 02/21/2013 04:20 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Without going into details, I'd like to see a 1.1.2 as a conservative > release that only fixes bugs (as you plan). The API and behavior should > have no surprises (maybe adding synchronized will have unexpected > side-effects in the behavior of clients). Then I would like to see a start > on working with a 1.2/2.0 frame of mind that can be more aggressive. That > or declare the component dead I suppose but we'd need to point to an > alternative like Log4J 2.
btw. the release-notes are already up-to-date and ready to be reviewed. Thomas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
