Hi Thomas, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 02/20/2013 09:33 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: >> Am 20.02.2013 16:42, schrieb t...@apache.org: >>> Author: tn >>> Date: Wed Feb 20 15:42:09 2013 >>> New Revision: 1448251 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1448251 >>> Log: >>> Update version info >>> >>> Modified: >>> commons/proper/logging/trunk/src/conf/MANIFEST.MF >>> >>> Modified: commons/proper/logging/trunk/src/conf/MANIFEST.MF >>> URL: >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/logging/trunk/src/conf/MANIFEST.MF?rev=1448251&r1=1448250&r2=1448251&view=diff >>> >>> ============================================================================== >>> >>> --- commons/proper/logging/trunk/src/conf/MANIFEST.MF (original) >>> +++ commons/proper/logging/trunk/src/conf/MANIFEST.MF Wed Feb 20 >>> 15:42:09 2013 >>> @@ -5,4 +5,4 @@ Specification-Version: 1.0 >>> Implementation-Title: Commons Logging >>> Implementation-Vendor-Id: org.apache >>> Implementation-Vendor: Apache Software Foundation >>> -Implementation-Version: 1.1.1 >>> +Implementation-Version: 1.1.2 >>> >>> >> Just wondering whether this is necessary. Doesn't the maven build >> automatically generate a fully configured MANIFEST including OSGi meta >> data? wondered about exactly the same. > > yes, but somehow the ant build script is still in use (e.g. for gump) > and both ant & maven refer to this hard-coded manifest. If Gump uses Ant here, this is just for historical reasons. Gump can use Maven since quite some time now. - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
