Hi Simone! Both changes sound good to me. You are more familiar than me with "builder" so I trust your word; and also "s/weight/math" sounds indeed more appropriate given the general purpose classes that it contains.
Cheers Claudio > Hi all grap-ers, > > I am doing the n-th review on [graph] and noticed small things could > be improved, such as 2 packages names that IMHO could be improved: > > * s/builder/connect: nothing that really reflects the builder > pattern, rather a small EDSL to describe graph element connections; > > * s/weight/math: Monoid and derivates sounds more familiar to a > generic math domain rather than pure weighted edges on graph. > > WDYT? > If there are no objections, I am going to apply that change. > > Many thanks in advance, all the best! > -Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > ----------------------------------------- This email was sent using SquirrelMail. https://email.dia.uniroma3.it Web Site: http://www.squirrelmail.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
