Thanks Hen!
any suggestion for the Array checkstyle violation?
TIA!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Clirr wins (assuming you're keeping 100% backwards compat and that
> clirr isn't playing up). checkstyle at 0 is an ideal not a necessary.
>
> Hen
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Simone Tripodi
> <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi all guys,
>> there are checkstyle violations that, if fixed, cause clirr
>> violations, and clirr violations that if fixed will cause checkstyle
>> errors... looks like the dog that bites its tail :)
>> Looks like having both to 0 is almost impossible for 1.4, so what
>> should be the policy? Which one has priority?
>> Many thanks in advance, all the best!!!
>>
>> PS speaking about checkstyle: how can I dumb the "'{' is followed by
>> whitespace." violation when the array is 'new Object[] { param }'?
>>
>> TIA!
>> Simo
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
