> > Not worth a long argument, but the reciprocal of a fraction is not exactly > the same concept as multiplicative inverse in a field. I would be happier > about living with that inconsistency than adding another noun/verb > inconsistency in the same class. > > Phil > Just for my own interest: if I understand correctly, reciprocal is specific to fractions? Is that correct. I'm not sure I understood your last point. Do you suggest we keep what's already there: negate()/reciprocal()? Thanks for these clarifications, Sébastien
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
