hahaha thanks! BTW I really hope there will be another chance to come back in charge with this proposal :) Have a nice day, Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 2:30 AM, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Simone Tripodi > <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote: >> Hi Matt!!! >> I noticed 2 important points I'd like to discuss: >> >> 1) generally speaking, the bigger part of the users are lazy: they >> just want to grab latest released artifact of XXX component with Maven >> and use it, so it is hard to obtain feedbacks from APIs not released >> yet; >> 2) committers/PMCs interested on Digester is reduced: we got two +1s, >> one +0 and I didn't express my opinion (If I would have done it, in my >> country they would have called me Mafia guy :D ) >> >> I didn't understand when you wrote "I'm certainly not going to twist >> your arm": of course you wouldn't do it physically :D but I didn't >> understand in which sense :P >> > > :) Just an expression meaning to try to make you do something against > your will. > > Matt > >> Have a nice day, all the best! >> Simo >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 6:37 AM, Simone Tripodi >>> <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> Hi all guys, >>>> looks like there's not enough activity/interest on new Digester, I >>>> suggest to suspend this topic for a while and come speaking about it >>>> until there will be interest from the users. >>>> Thanks to all that took part of the discussion! >>>> All the best, have a nice day, >>>> Simo >>> >>> Personally, I think that just because the users aren't clamoring for >>> the new API doesn't mean they wouldn't like it if Digester3 were >>> released. At the same time, I'm certainly not going to twist your >>> arm. >>> >>> Matt >>> >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Simone Tripodi >>>> <simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> thanks for the trust guys!!! I won't express my vote, it would be too >>>>> incorrect IMHO. I'll keep my finger crossed to see at least the 3 >>>>> consensus :) >>>>> Have a nice weekend! >>>>> Simo >>>>> >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>>>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mar 19, 2011, at 11:05 AM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 3/19/11 4:54 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hi Rahul, >>>>>>>>> thanks once again for the wise suggestions, much more than >>>>>>>>> appreciated! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I underestimated the importance of the users over the active >>>>>>>>> developers, so I totally agree with you, moving to dormant is >>>>>>>>> premature. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I was aware about breaking APIs compatibility, since we had to face >>>>>>>>> the same problem also in [pool2], I thought it would have been a good >>>>>>>>> idea implementing the sandbox in the o.a.c.digester3[1] package, looks >>>>>>>>> like it is compliant to the suggestions you proposed. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I like your idea of branching 1.X, 2.X and put 3 on trunk, shall we >>>>>>>>> call a vote before going on? >>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>> I don't think we need a VOTE on this, I would say wait a couple of >>>>>>>> more days to make sure we have (lazy) consensus and then just do it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> <snip/> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Not that I care for more process, but I'd like to see 3+ of us say >>>>>>> this is the API they'd like to see for digester3. We also generally >>>>>>> require votes for getting stuff out of sandbox so a vote may not be a >>>>>>> bad idea (even if this isn't a new component, its a new API -- and >>>>>>> somewhere in there, the lines are blurred). I'm +0. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I hesitate to throw in an opinion as I've never really used digester, >>>>>> but I quite like the API personally, and would +1 this. >>>>>> >>>>>> Matt >>>>>> >>>>>>> -Rahul >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
