I think there may be a problem with the pom.xml, as it refers to the RC6 tag:
<connection>scm:svn:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jexl/tags/COMMONS_JEXL_2_0-RC6</connection>
<developerConnection>scm:svn:https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jexl/tags/COMMONS_JEXL_2_0-RC6</developerConnection>
<url>http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/jexl/tags/COMMONS_JEXL_2_0-RC6</url>
Once the release is approved, ideally the tag should be renamed to
remove the -RC6 suffix.
This will invalidate the URLs. Even if the RC6 tag is kept, it does
not look right to publish the release with the RC6 URL.
I don't think it's necessary to redo the release - just fix the pom
and its hashes/sig before deployment.
On 23/01/2010, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Unfortunately BUILDING.txt was not included in the release, but that's
> not a blocker, so:
>
> +1
>
>
>
>
> On 23/01/2010, henrib <hen...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Apache Commons community,
> > The vote is extended till 2010-01-29.
> > There are two +1 binding votes, Jexl only needs one more and 2.0 can be
> > released.
> > Thanks for your support (and votes).
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Jexl-2-0-tp1016004p1262764.html
> >
> > Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
