+1 from me. Go ahead and break it. :)
On 3/14/08, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > On 3/14/08, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Niall Pemberton > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 3:20 AM, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > How does removing the parameter solve the leaking? > > > > > > > > Hi Paul, > > > > > > > > I don't want to put you off, but I'm just in the process of writing > > up > > > > some stuff that I'll post on the JIRA ticket - which is probably the > > > > best place to discuss actual changes/issues. Really I was just > > looking > > > > for opinions on breaking compatibility with a Beta release in this > > > > thread - a heads up, rather than me going ahead and making changes > > > > only to find people objecting if/when theres a release vote for > > > > BeanUtils. > > > > > > > > > Doesn't mean much as I'm such a liberal on the subject; but break > > > compat with beta release +1. > > > > > <snip/> > > > > I think thats fine as well. > > > > From the versioning docs [1]: > > > > <quote> > > While every effort should be made to ensure the quality of released > > code, "beta" releases are essentially provided as-is with no > > guarantees of stability or maintenance. > > </quote> > > > > -Rahul > > > > [1] http://commons.apache.org/releases/versioning.html > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
