Thanks a lot for fixing this. I'll configure my svn.. commons-performance is more (AFAIK) a load-test runner. It also produces statistics, so could overlap for some classes. I'll look at this to estimate how much this overlap and if / how we could synchronize our work.
Nico. 2008/1/23, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Jan 23, 2008 4:21 PM, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm pleased to publish the initial PROPOSAL document for the monitoring > > component (sandbox) : > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox/monitoring/trunk/PROPOSAL.html > > > > Some initial draft code has also been commited in SVN > > > > I've also initiated a design document at > > http://wiki.apache.org/commons/Monitoring > > Could you configure your svn client's "auto-props" so that it > automatically adds eol style and keywords when you add new artifacts. > I just fixed this for monitoring - but as you can see changing the eol > style created alot of *noise". I also took the liberty of correcting a > couple of mistakes in the proposal and uploading the generated site so > the javadocs are available to view - which should make it easier for > people to have a quick look - should be there in the next 4 hours > after the next sync: > > http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/monitoring/ > > I haven't really looked properly but is there overlap here with the > performance component thats in the sandbox? > > http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/performance/ > > Nial > > > Nico. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >