Thanks a lot for fixing this. I'll configure my svn..

commons-performance is more (AFAIK) a load-test runner. It also produces
statistics, so could overlap for some classes. I'll look at this to estimate
how much this overlap and if / how we could synchronize our work.

Nico.


2008/1/23, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Jan 23, 2008 4:21 PM, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm pleased to publish the initial PROPOSAL document for the monitoring
> > component (sandbox) :
> >
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox/monitoring/trunk/PROPOSAL.html
> >
> > Some initial draft code has also been commited in SVN
> >
> > I've also initiated a design document at
> > http://wiki.apache.org/commons/Monitoring
>
> Could you configure your svn client's "auto-props" so that it
> automatically adds eol style and keywords when you add new artifacts.
> I just fixed this for monitoring - but as you can see changing the eol
> style created alot of *noise". I also took the liberty of correcting a
> couple of mistakes in the proposal and uploading the generated site so
> the javadocs are available to view - which should make it easier for
> people to have a quick look - should be there in the next 4 hours
> after the next sync:
>
> http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/monitoring/
>
> I haven't really looked properly but is there overlap here with the
> performance component thats in the sandbox?
>
> http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/performance/
>
> Nial
>
> > Nico.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to