Carsten Ziegeler skrev:
Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:
Reinhard Poetz pisze:
Some suggestions
servlet:byId:com.mycompany.block1.servlet:/...
servlet:!com.mycompany.block1.servlet:/...
servlet:~com.mycompany.block1.servlet:/...
servlet:@com.mycompany.block1.servlet:/...
My favorite is the last one.
I really like last one. I would agree to have such a syntax.
Now, I don't want to spoil the contest here, but I would be great if we
could choose a real url syntax which is parsable by the java.net.URL
class. It is a) good to have valid urls and b) a long time ago we had
the idea of just using plain java.net.url implementations instead of the
source resolver bean (and actually I'm currently working on this), so
all sources which are now available through the source resolver will be
available using the plain java api.
Being able to use java.net.URL would be awesome!
So, I think its worth considering this now :)
Absolutely, but AFAICS the above URI:s actually are valid. According to
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/net/URL.html the URL syntax
is defined by RFC 2396 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt). And for
opaque URI:s (i.e. if scheme-specific part does not begin with a slash,
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/net/URI.html#isOpaque())
there are very few restrictions on the scheme specific part.
URL:s of the form block:foo:/bar worked fine with java.net.URL in the
Cocoon OSGi prototype.
/Daniel
