Reinhard Poetz wrote: > Vadim Gritsenko wrote: >> the only thing which is 'broken' compared with 2.1 >> is logging. > > ... which forces the user to recompile. Do we want or do we have to accept > this? > Although the change is a very simple one, it would be better to have a > deprecation period to give our users some more time. Independent from this the users have to recompile - we removed deprecated stuff, changed interal api, updated 3rd party libraries. I guess there will be much more problems than this. In addition, with 2.2 you might need a different project setup anyway.
> > Is there any chance to make the Spring beanfactory acknowledging the > LoggingEnabled interface? > What do you mean? LoggingEnabled works for Avalon components. Do you want to enable it for "real" Spring beans? We could just provide a bean factory post processor for this. > Second question: Do we consider component implementations (EHCacheStore, > CachingImpl, etc.) being public API or their interfaces only? I think only the interfaces are public api. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
