On Tuesday 19 December 2006 03:13, Mark Lundquist wrote: > On Dec 18, 2006, at 7:15 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > That is a valid concern. We kind of painted ourselves in a box by > > calling trunk 2.2 way before it was ready to be anything. > > Agreed, IMHO all future releases beyond 2.2 (will that actually be > "2.2.0"?) should use internal code names until right before we cut the > release. Then we can have the numbering discussions and settle on the > right thing without any historical encumbrance.
Very good observation. What will Maven think of <version>lycaenidae-SNAPSHOT</version>?? Cheers Niclas [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lycaenidae
