On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 14:07 -0800, Mark Lundquist wrote: ... > > > I think we should use two different keywords because otherwise the > > content model depends on the presence of various attributes and not on > > the tagname only -- that is really confusing. > > To my mind, a special element to distinguish conditionals having > exactly 1 alternative is no more desirable than a special element to > distinguish conditionals having exactly two alternatives, or three, or > any other number; that is to say, not desirable at all. In the scheme > I've proposed, it's very easy (and to me, natural) to tell how many > alternatives a matcher has. > > best regards, > —ml—
Could you try to write a Relax NG schema sniplet (preferable in compact notation) for validating your proposed syntax? Cheers, Alfred.
