Reinhard Poetz wrote: > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >> Nice, >> >> to avoid all legal problems - what would it take to use this version in >> 2.1.x? > > a vote ;-) Ah, right, thanks :)
> IIRC Rhino 1.6 is binary compatible to the version we use in 2.1 Hmm, I'm not sure - I think we had to change some parts in the interpreter, but I might be wrong. > >> I know that this might introduce some incompatibilities, but >> perhaps we can live with them? > > not sure, see > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=109528520325331&w=2 > I remember some users using these features. > Yes, and that's exactly the question, if we want go this road. Now if people are upgrading to 2.2 in the future they have to live with these changes anyway. WDAT? Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Chief Architect http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
