-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 3 Sep 2006, Leszek Gawron wrote:

Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2006 20:34:19 +0200
From: Leszek Gawron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: XPatch support for maven-cocoon-deployer-plugin

Reinhard Poetz wrote:
 Leszek Gawron (JIRA) wrote:

>  I want to implement some more features for cocoon:deploy XPatching:

 First, because of a lack of time I haven't had much time to understand in
 detail what your needs are. So take my concerns as what they are: a gut
 feeling.

 I think we are about to overdo what a deployment mechanism (and XPatch) is
 about and can/should do for us. Whenver you extend the deployer keep in
 mind what Cocoon blocks at a sitemap level are about (polymorphism &
 inheritance) and that we can (and IMO should) backport the things that
 already work in the OSGi mode. Because of that I don't think it's a good
 idea to e.g. be able to patch any file at deployment time instead of only
 patching web.xml

 After my holidays I will have a closer look at this topic and can give
 some more qualified feedback.
Just a few examples of what can be currently achieved only by patching:

- modifying a generated sitemap when testing a block (mvn compile cocoon:deploy jetty:run on a development block)

I'd suppose using own ones for such in the src/test path

- tweaking store janitor

Should be adjustable by properties (dunno exactly what you wantto tweak)

- configuring transient store max objects

Same as above: Property

- configuring continuations manager

Again: Properties

- you won't even be able to define a new cforms widget definition because they don't use the new service selector that allows to span components over several files.

So this cries for a patch ;-)

While some things are trivial to fix some are not and all definitely need some committer attention. The problem with declaring widgets in other files is probably a year old.

Yes I think we are aware of the cform "new widget" problems. But what do you mean by "committer attention"?

Ciao

- -- Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFE/H0CLNdJvZjjVZARAiLzAJ9kgkgYjSAvyuzBPQxTlhBYMu0LXwCg5FQQ
XND5Hsq90PhTgOQFVdWlkWo=
=Titu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to