Peter Hunsberger wrote: > Sorry, in my book that's not a valid reason. I think it is inappropriate for you to judge whether his reason is valid or not.
He said "in my book"
Furthermore, his veto won't be overturned by such a statement. Although I agree with your argument below, I'm also not in favor of questioning someone endlessly about a veto.
As a mater of fact a veto needs to have a good reason. Especially now with the argument Peter was giving I am also questioning whether that is actually a good reason. I don't think that this thread is endless yet. We already had much longer discussions about much less. If someone vetos something he needs to be prepared to stand up for that and face the discussion ...as long as we keep this on a professional level (...no pointing fingers, other communities in mind) cheers -- Torsten
