On 8/14/06, Joerg Heinicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 14.08.2006 22:19, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:
<snip/>
This remains my main point though: losing some of our user base. You may never have been working for a bank, but there such changes in the requirements take years til they get applied. When we wrote an application based on Mozilla 1.0 the customer still used Netscape 4.0.x, not even the latest available version of Netscape at that time, which was 4.7.x IIRC. We fought for weeks until it was allowed to get Mozilla 1.0 installed on their desktop computers. Andrew's mail from half an hour ago seems to affirm this.
No, Andrews mail does not confirm anything. Why would any institution that is so conservative that they run ancient versions of other software suddenly jump to the bleeding edge of Cocoon? If they are not willing to run a newer version of Websphere (with full vendor support) that fixes 100s of know bugs then why would they suddenly want to run some new version of Cocoon? <snip/>
I still stand with my -1 vote.
Since you haven't given us any real reason to support your vote I don't see how we can consider it a veto? -- Peter Hunsberger
