-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, Giacomo Pati wrote:
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:01:17 +0200 (CEST)
From: Giacomo Pati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Please review changes to WildcardHelper
--[PinePGP]--------------------------------------------------[begin]--
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, Giacomo Pati wrote:
I'll do a quick check whether our test cases pass with the mentioned
class.
Uh, it's not conforming to our "pattern definition" (escaping, character
'?' ) and inserting code to grab the matched part might become heavy.
Giving up.
I've written a new WildcardMatcherHelper class fron ground up as well as
a TestCase for it. Please review especially the TestCase and add cases
you think wasn't tested so far (the original test case had as few as 3
tests where the new one already has 19 tests and I still feel there
could be more).
If people think we should switch to the new one give me a go and I'll
do.
TIA
Giacomo
>
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
--[PinePGP]-----------------------------------------------------------
gpg: Signature made Tue Jun 20 14:01:22 2006 CEST using DSA key ID 98E35590
gpg: Good signature from "Giacomo Pati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
gpg: aka "Giacomo Pati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
gpg: aka "Giacomo Pati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
--[PinePGP]----------------------------------------------------[end]--
- --
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEmldiLNdJvZjjVZARAskqAJ9qyBx9gfOm5P31Vk+3U1ha6UKwGgCdFWjq
SWUVB1V9movUaWBsDa65Qbk=
=IHvL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
