On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 14:49 -0700, Jason Johnston wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 21:10 +0000, Upayavira wrote:
> > Jason Johnston wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 08:46 -0800, Ralph Goers wrote:
> > >> Bruno Dumon wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 06:35 -0800, Ralph Goers wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hi. Its me again.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Seriously, are we there yet?
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>> I guess nothing changed since you last asked ;-)
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >> Not quite. A few days passed, which is all Sylvain said he needed.
> > >> AFAIK that is all we are waiting for.
> > >
> > >
> > > It gets mentioned every time someone asks about the 2.1.9 release, so to
> > > keep the pattern going: what about the Template block from trunk? IIRC
> > > this was discussed and planned for inclusion in 2.1.9.
> >
> > Could you make a patch? That could make it happen.
>
> I would be glad to. But I would need guidance, since I know nothing
> about what is required. Is it just adding an svn:external to that
> block, or are there code changes involved?
I just gave this a try to see if it needs any special work.
Here's what I did or found out:
* copied the java sources (src/main/java)
* resources (src/main/resources):
- 2.2 has imports for xconf and xroles, so for 2.1 I had to create a
set of patch files (similar as is done for forms): nothing special here
- the resources also contained a file template-instructions.xml, I
copied this to the java sources
* the template block needs the (new in 2.2) class
TemplateObjectModelHelper, which is outside of the template block. I
copied it in the sources of the template block
* class JavascriptExpression and TemplateObjectModelHelper: require
changes due to changed rhino API. For JavascriptExpression I simply
commented out the code since it is not essential.
* I got classcast exceptions when StringTemplateFactory and
ExpressionFactory were looked up from the ServiceManager. The cause is
that these classes don't have a "service interface" (their role is a
concrete class). I introduced interfaces for them.
* Added block to gump.xml and block.properties
And then it worked. I tried it first with a simple test file and then
with the forms block, and everything seems ok.
- o -
To summarize: if we want to have a shared codebase for the template
block, things that need to handled:
- introduce interface for StringTemplateFactory and ExpressionFactory
==> this is something I can do
- don't make use of new rhino API features: I need someone else to look
into this
- Move template_instructions.xml between the java sources instead of
the resources: I could do this, if nobody objects or knows a better way
- TemplateObjectModelHelper: could duplicate it into 2.1 core
Opinions? Objections? Help?
--
Bruno Dumon http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]