* Andrew Stevens: > * "Antonio Fiol Bonn?n" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > I suppose that it's there because 99% of searches are > > paginated and very few could be cached... Er... Is the > > search generator cacheable? > > Good question, I've no idea. I don't see why it shouldn't > be, though.
AFAICT SearchGenerator does not implement CacheableProcessingComponent. -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot http://caraldi.com/jbq/
