Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote: > * Carsten Ziegeler: > > >>Sylvain Wallez schrieb: >> >> >>>Jean-Baptiste can elaborate on this, but AFAIU this is because >>>an interesting XSP patch requires a servlet listener, which is >>>something that was added in servlets 2.3. >> >>So, he could just add a mock class for the listener to the xsp >>block, add the listener and we are done with this. > > > Yes, I want to integrate a patch that allows to run an *optional* > component on webapp startup to compile XSP. It's only for > *compilation* that servlet 2.3 is needed, not for runtime, unless > the user explicitly activates in web.xml the optional component > (it's a SessionListener). > > Servlet 2.3 will *not* be required to run Cocoon.
A mock sounds like a _much_ better way! Regards, Upayavira
