Giacomo Pati wrote: > > Should this distinction be on the groupId? > Isn't the groupId just saying that all stuff in it belongs to the same > project? > Yes, I think so - but what about sub projects? :) Now, I guess this can turn into a philosphical discussion about what the best approach is. I personally would add "blocks" to the groupId to distinguish this from other parts/subprojects, like o.a.c.tools etc. But if we choose just o.a.c, I'm fine as well.
Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
