-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:

Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 21:58:59 +0100
From: Daniel Fagerstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: svn commit: r367382 - in /cocoon/trunk/lib:
    core/jetty-jmx-5.1.8.jar   core/mx4j-3.0.1.jar core/mx4j-jmx-3.0.1.jar
    jars.xml

Jorg Heymans skrev:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Author: giacomo
> Date: Mon Jan  9 12:12:17 2006
> New Revision: 367382
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=367382&view=rev
> Log:
> try to fix issues with JMX but couldn't test it as current build.sh isn't > working for a full build

 build.sh is broken because of the repository flattening.

 I'm wondering actually how long we should still keep trunk/lib around.
 It can confuse people into thinking that this way of building is
 still/will still be supported.

I would prefer removing the trunk/lib and Ant build system ASAP, and that everybody helps getting the parts they care for working with the Maven build.

Yes, ASAP!

- -- Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDwtffLNdJvZjjVZARAoWUAKDh2gUx6psdcAQuKLgLm0ynO9TffwCgkUyA
7DPqCmR50ih5DISYSqOfxzs=
=ggGP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to