Giacomo Pati wrote: > Comparing jetty's jmx helper calsses to the commons-modeler I see > benefits for jetty's as that package supports MBean arrays whereas > commons-modeler only supports primitive arrays. MBean array would make > it possible to make array components implementing the same interface > (ServiceSelector) directly registrable as MBean (for those which > implements an MBean interface). > Ah, ok, so it seems jetty's support is the better choice then.
> >>>So, big +1 for adding JMX support to 2.2 :) > > > And what about 2.1? > No, not for 2.1 - 2.1.x is just a maintenance branch - at least we keep saying this...and we all tell everyone that 2.2 will be out soon, so from that perspective there is no real need for adding this to 2.1. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
