Hi Mark: If the bug was not fixed, then the correct is to reopen it. I already did that. You can see the activity history here:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_activity.cgi?id=30417 Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo Mark Lundquist dijo: > So anyway, I didn't know if I should (a) re-open the bug, (b) create a > new one for the new patch, or (c) leave it CLOSED but attach my revised > patch. I guessed (c) was probably the right answer... please advise > :-) > > ~mark > > On Nov 1, 2004, at 1:06 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG >> RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT >> <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30417>. >> ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND >> INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. >> >> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30417 >> >> [PATCH] ImageReader needs "uniform scale-to-fit" option >> >> >> >> >> >> ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-01 21:06 >> ------- >> This bug was RESOLVED/FIXED/CLOSED 3 weeks ago, but the patch hasn't >> been committed? Maybe >> that's OK, I don't know... >> >> Anyway, there was a slight bug in my original patch, so I'm attaching >> a revised patch that should >> SUPERSEDE the original patch.... >> >
