Ralph Goers wrote: > > I have been looking at the copletinstancedata and copletdata > objects. > It does not appear that the attributes associated with each > of these objects are in any way related to each other. It > would seem logical to me that accessing the attributes > through copletinstancedata would also retrieve attributes > from copletdata (with the attributes in copletinstancedata > taking precedence). However, this is not the case. > Is this deliberate or would some problem occur if I change > this behavior? > Now, the original idea was exactly to have this behaviour, but unfortunately we soon ran into problems with Castor converting the objects to XML. But apart from that I see no problems with it. (PS: if anyone has a better way for the conversion than Castor it would make me very happy).
Carsten
