Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Rogier Peters a �crit : > > > ...Although I agree completely that it's the accessability, not the > > quality of the documentation that is lacking, i can't help but hearing > > echoes of the GT cms-shootout ( bag of docs; heavy on search ). > > Why use forrest and not daisy or hippo? > > I wanted to put Forrest as the first option for "loyalty" reasons, as > the Forrest team has helped us a lot until now. But there are many > options of course.
Thanks, we are grateful for that loyalty. Don't feel bound by it. > But at this point we should be careful not to fall into the trap of > discussing tools before agreing on the problem. Yes, it is a strong magnet. -- David Crossley
