Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 21 oct. 04, � 11:54, Upayavira a �crit :
...If we have needs for running our own stuff, e.g. having the latest Cocoon samples usable from the Cocoon website, we should make a request to the infrastructure team for a VM for ourselves, as soon as they have done the necessary hardware upgrades....
If it's debian I'm willing to help setup and co-administer such a machine. Could also help with other distros but it's really debian that I know the best, and apt-get is a big plus assuming the admin would be shared between several people.
Me too (debian that is).
Having our own live Cocoon instance(s) could make all the difference in the way we do our docs, so if there's an opportunity I think we should make it happen.
How much access these machines can handle I don't know - i.e. infrastructure maintain minotaur at a level that can handle all of our HTTP access to cocoon.apache.org. Whether a VM could handle hosting cocoon.apache.org, I don't know. But if we stuck Apache with mod_cache in front, who knows?
BTW, where did you learn all this, is there a list that I'm missing? infrastructure@ ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sit on there and read. You'll learn a lot!
...In the meantime, using our existing mechanisms, we should do as Antonio suggested - improve the notes on the livesites page, stating: Put an entry entitled [LINK] Blah into bugzilla, and answer these questions. If you don't answer them, your request will not be considered.
+1
Helma, what do you think? Could you create a patch for this?
Regards, Upayavira
