Carsten Ziegeler dijo: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Vadim Gritsenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 5:49 PM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: StaticBucketMap, Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30148] - >> Internal serverError >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30148>. >> > >> > ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > 2004-08-10 11:01 ------- The bug was fixed in 2.1.4. Carsten kindly >> > replaced any reference to the StaticBucketMap with a synchronized >> > HashMap (not nice, but it works). This was done in the Excalibur >> > ComponentManager package. Commons-Collections still has the >> non-threadsafe StaticBucketMap in it. >> >> I took a looong look at the current version of >> StaticBucketMap [1] but fail to see how it is not thread >> safe... Can anybody give a guess, what can go wrong in this code? >> > I can't :( I looked as well through this code and didn't find anything. > But there must be something, as not only Lars but several others had > problems with this map under heavy load. Making the map synchronized > fixed the problem in all cases.
Can you please report it to the commons-collectiosn guys? Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo > > Carsten >
