Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hunsberger, Peter wrote: > > > I saw this go by on the xml-dev list this morning and my > first thought > > was "boy, there would be a way to make the sitemap even > harder to work > > with". After looking at it closer I'm not sure exactly how > you could > > make a sitemap with this combination, though from the > description one > > would think it should fit the bill of combining the sitemap > and flow > > exactly. > > > > In any case, have a look at: > > > > http://www2004.org/proceedings/docs/2p340.pdf > > > > For a description of the "XJ" language. (A solution looking for a > > problem?) > > XJ is just like XSP but taken code-side first. > Now there's a thought: sitemaps in XSP... Given my level of comfort with XSP, JSP and similar I'm still wondering exactly what problem XJ is supposed to solve.
