DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29881>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29881 Problems using datatype type="date" variant="time" ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-03 19:34 ------- I've made some changes, and now as a result I get a validation error message of: Not a valid datatype.time. Which is better, but still not exactly English. It ought to read: Not a valid time. It looks like the name of the key is being substituted, not the value of the message. I don't know how this works, but I suspect the {0} in: <message key="datatype.conversion-failed">Not a valid {0}.</message> is incorrect. Or perhaps there is a two-stage lookup needed, and only 1 stage is being performed.
