Bertrand Delacretaz dijo: > Le 9 juin 04, � 09:55, Sylvain Wallez a �crit : > >> Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >> What if you have a partial update, e.g. keep the officially released >> core, but use a snapshot of a periperal function or blocks? > > Hmmm...yes, that's clearly a use-case for individual file revision > info. Another case would be when you have your own source code control > system for parts of Cocoon that you (temporarily) maintain yourself, > like what you currently do with your forms stuff. > > Note that I have nothing against your including of source files in jars > as a switchable option - you're right that this is the more precise > info that we can provide. > > My conclusion would be that including the SVN revision number as > proposed by Antonio is good for the common case, and your "include > source in jars" switch can be used for extreme/uncommon cases - so why > not have both?
Sylvain: Please, note I already agreed with your proposal. I understand it is convenient at special cases. I am just against to make them a default. About the SVN Revision Number, I think is convenient too and it will be enough for snapshot users. But, I am not sure if it can be "on" as default. WDYT? Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo. Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo.
