On 3 Jun 2004, at 13:10, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Hi Jeremy:
I have another problem, but maybe it is related. I have a question. Are
you using subsitemaps? Can you explain how are distributed the .js files?
Yes we are using sub-sitemaps.
"sitemap.xmap" :
cocoon's main sitemap mounts our top-level 'project' sitemap : "sitemap.xmap" :
uses 'authentication.js' flowscript
provides views of static XML documents
mounts each sub-section sitemap :
"authenticate.xmap" :
provides authentication services
uses 'authentication.js' flowscript "record.xmap" :
provides database record viewing services
uses 'records.js' and 'pager.js' flowscript "search.xmap" :
provides lucene index searching services
uses 'search.js' and 'pager.js' flowscript "lucene.xmap" :
provides database record indexing services
uses 'lucene.js' flowscript "upload.xmap" :
provides database record creation and asset uploading services
uses 'upload.js' flowscriptHTH
regards Jeremy
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo
Jeremy Quinn dijo:Hi All
I just upgraded an existing project to 2.1.5 and am experiencing some strange problems with FlowScript.
I am seeing a lot of these errors:
org.apache.avalon.framework.CascadingRuntimeException:
"resource://org/apache/cocoon/forms/flow/javascript/Form.js", line 203:
uncaught JavaScript exception: at handleForm
(resource://org/apache/cocoon/forms/flow/javascript/Form.js, Line 203):
"uploadImage" is not a function.
These appear to be erroneous (it clearly IS a function and worked fine under previous versions), and nearly random in appearance (sometimes you get this sometimes you don't).
The next problem I started seeing was errors related to instantiating Java Objects from Flow, where the flow engine would complain that the package paths were ambiguous. What was worse was that these messages would GO AWAY on reload !!!!!
I suspect the new caching system (which throws exceptions on shutdown).
I am using the Release version of Cocoon 2.1.5 (we always attempt to only use release versions for development and we have several people working on the same project at the same time, and that makes it far easier).
Are there any known issues with 2.1.5 release that may be causing this behaviour ?
Many thanks for any suggestions.
regards Jeremy
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
