Il giorno 20/apr/04, alle 18:55, Nicola Ken Barozzi ha scritto:
These rules are the ones that came out of HTTPD land, and reflect a codebase that changes very differently from ours. What you should really be looking at is: http://xml.apache.org/decisions.html
I had already looked there, but that page strikes me as a wierd mix of circular and incomplete definitions.
For me, this is a majority vote. If it were a consensus vote, I'd have voted -0.
My rule of the thumb:
1 - a veto generally applies to cvs commits that are dangerous and that can be technically demonstrated to be so
2 - all other votes are majority
3 - if a majority vote is split, try to get more consensus
4 - if it's a minor thing, just do it, and don't ask a vote. At most just a heads up and go for it.
In any case, we need our guidelines.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------