On 19.04.2004 10:08, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:

And we have the concerns from Ugo and Joerg? What do you two
think, now after I could convince Ralph :) ?

And it's really difficult to convince Ralph if the issue is backwards compatibility related AFAIK :)


So I vote +1 for further development in 2.1 if it's only concerned to "private" interfaces. If "public" interfaces are related I suggest to switch to Cocoon 2.2 for this stuff, which is then a cleaner 2.1 and is nearly fully compatible. For the new container/blocks stuff I would like to see a Cocoon 3.0.

Joerg

Reply via email to