On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 02:49, Joerg Heinicke wrote: > On 06.04.2004 17:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > joerg 2004/04/06 08:32:03 > > > > Modified: src/blocks/forms/samples/forms form1_template.xml > > form1_template_action.xml > > Log: > > Tim, forget my stupid comment about different styling in and outside of > > repeaters - find the difference ;-) > > > > I only wonder why I have done the mistake multiple times > > This led me to the question why the form model does not give the styling > hint to the pipeline. Of course, it is styling, but for the date it is > somewhat datatype centric. In the stylesheet there is also a comment > about getting the convertor's format out of the form model - this issue > would be solved too. > > WDYT?
Something like that's needed indeed. I wouldn't insert the styling hint though, but let the datatype and convertor produce some XML, like: <fi:datatype type="java.lang.Date"> <fi:convertor pattern="dd-MM-yyyy"/> </fi:datatype> -- Bruno Dumon http://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
