See: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=107718576400005&r=1&w=2
Thanks Carsten > -----Original Message----- > From: DURDINA Michal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 3:58 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Portal] Question: Why JSR-168 portlet impl moved? > > Hi, > I am curious why Carsten moved portlet implementation from > scratchpad to portal block... I thought JSR-168 portlet > implementation would go to core. > > I think that CocoonPortlet (JSR-168 portlet implementation) > and portal block are two different things. > > CocoonPortlet makes cocoon applications work under portlet > container (i.e. Jakarta Pluto). > Portal block IS a portlet container (Portal Engine makes > environment for coplets and portlets). > > So I don't see the reason why to mix these two. > > Why must I be dependent on the whole portal block (jar is > 330kB and will be more) when I want to implement just one > JSR-168 portlet using cocoon? I supposed that JSR-168 portlet > implementation would go to core, where other env > implementations are (Servlet and CLI). What was the reason > for not doing so? > > Thanks, > Michal > > BTW: Tiny patch for CocoonPortal.java is now in Bugzilla #27188 >
