Berin Loritsch wrote: > > Unico Hommes wrote: > > > - Recomposable / Reconfigurable interfaces: no solution yet, needs > > refactoring. > > We need to make these unneeded. > > > - Support for current sitemap syntax instead of Fortress shorthand > > syntax (?) > > Easy enough to do. All you need to do is override the > configure() method and create addComponent() calls with the > appropriate meta-info. >
DefaultContainer.configure(), AbstractContainer.addComponent(), ComponentHandlerMetaData() No problem. > > - SourceResolver: several options on the table. > > - ... ? > > The biggest thing is the TreeBuilder--I can't tell you > everything that would need to change, but the more hands in > that thing, the better for Cocoon in general. Before it > "just worked" so there was no reason to get involved. > However, now there are some things that need to change, so > maybe we could see some improvements to its design, I dunno. > OK. I am going to look at this and see if I can come up with some appropriate questions. > > > > > >>* Make the Main class work with the new bean. > >>* Get rid of the old bean. > > > > > > This should be straightforward? > > Should be. > > > > >>I have no more time, and the TreeBuilder is very tightly integrated. > >> > >>I think I have done the hard stuff OK (the support for Request > >>Lifestyle and company). > >> > > > > > > Then it would be even more of a let down if we let this go. > > I will lend any guidance I can and answer any questions you have. > Great, thanks for all the work you have put into this already. I'd hate it if we had to throw all that away. -- Unico
