From: Sylvain Wallez > But I'm also wondering, as woody usage increases, if we will > not need to > write form templates involving more and more conditional > parts. And for > this, JXTemplate shines. But mixing jx-like access to the form model > with wt: templates elements is likely to quickly become unnatural. A > solution could be to augment the JXTemplate syntax with new > Woody-related instructions. Taglibs for JXTemplate? > > What do you think (again)?
I think what we need is a possibility to extand a basic JXTemplateGenerator/Transformer to add your own syntax. Otherwise we will end in many different *TemplateGenerators/Transformers which have to be maintained separatly. But I think you meant this with Taglibs, don't you? Anyway, a big +1 for *one* official *extensible* templating approach in Cocoon - otherwise we will confuse our users. -- Reinhard
