Joerg Heinicke wrote: > > Reinhard Poetz wrote: > > From: Carsten Ziegeler > > > > > >>Can anyone please give me short hint/pointer why we have > >>so two classes that look very identical? > > > > > > The Javascript-Interpreter is the *old* one that doesn't implement the > > later introduced FOM. For compatibility reasons I haven't deleted it yet > > although it has never been published but maybe some early adopters used > > it and I wanted to give them some time to make the changes. > > > > In 2.2 we can delete it, what do you think for 2.1? > > > > Reinhard > > Delete it in 2.2, deprecate it in 2.1. > +1
Carsten
