On Oct 17, 2003, at 12:39 PM, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Sylvain Wallez dijo:Yep. And posts like Barzilai's one make me wonder if we should stop
development in the 2.1 repo and move it over to 2.2 into a new "cforms"
(Cocoon forms) block. Note that this doesn't prevent to backport this
block to 2.1 before an official 2.2 release if we consider that it has
reached some level of stability (including docs).
-1. I think woody need to get improved even faster than the current trend
in the current release too. 2.2 is far away and since it will be at a
stable level this would slowdown the development of woody. :-(
I totaly agree with the above..
O.K., Cocoon evolves and is in permanent state of flux, which is quite natural, but it mustn't turn into a permanent teleology, I feel more and more discouraged to use these new features of the long awaited v.2.1. When 2.0 was out and 2.1 just started everyone was looking forward to have a xml-form framework. Now we have 3 of it, but only few people use it, because there is too much hope again - for v.2.2.
/leo
