On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 16:31, Sylvain Wallez wrote:<snip/>
For these reasons, I propose to make <wi:style> explicit in the template file, e.g. : <wt:widget ref="foo"> <!-- new "ref" attribute !! --> <wi:style class="bar" variant="popup"/> <wi:label>overriden label</wi:label> </wt:wiget/>
Thoughts ?
Again: yeah, it is better ;-)
Kewl again ;-)
While I'm thinking of it, there is a somewhat similar situation in the form definition files: widgets that have child widgets, such as wd:form and wd:repeater, currently have these child widgets listed immediately inside the wd:form and wd:repeater elements. It would be better to wrap those inside a wd:children element (or similar), so that forms and repeaters can have other configuration elements too.
This totally makes sense :
- in XMLForm, I used <xf:label> on <xf:groups> to produce the <label> of a <fieldset>
- an aggregate field, being a leaf from the GUI point of view, must have its label, format, etc.
Sylvain
-- Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies http://www.apache.org/~sylvain http://www.anyware-tech.com { XML, Java, Cocoon, OpenSource }*{ Training, Consulting, Projects } Orixo, the opensource XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
