Steven Noels wrote: > > <interlude advise="don't take this too seriously"> > > More stupidity being put forward, I would humbly suggest to explicitely > name the methodologies: > > 1) 'Barbara', in kind remembrance of B. Post > 2) 'Carsten, the Early Years' > 3) 'SchemoVidiuChrismatron' > 4) 'Species' - since Apples and Pears are way to generic already, and > it's what Darwin was all about > 5) 'Rag' - since Dywel really sounds like a mop in Dutch if slightly > misspelled > > ... in order to be able to ask a Cocoonie: what religion are you in? > "Oh, I used to be an early CultofBarbara groupie, but now I tend to > worship the mighty SchemoVidiuChrismatron." > > </interlude> > > Kidding aside, is my categorization more or less correct? Might be cool > to put on a slide once. > More or less :) perhaps it's not correct to but my name together with actions at 2), we all know who checked in the Action interface...
Serious: what about a humour page on our web site with nice and funny things like these? Especially I like 'SchemoVidiuChrismatron' ! Carsten
