Gianugo Rabellino wrote: > Gianugo Rabellino wrote: >>> I already submitted a patch to bugzilla. >>> I'm however unsure where this RequestGenerator should go since it >>> has a dependancy on JTidy. Maybe it should be renamed and go in the >>> HTML block besides the HTMLGenerator. But it doesn't really make >>> sense to have 2 RequestGenerators. >> >> >> I'm wondering whether it would be better to extend the HTML generator >> instead so that it accepts not only html files as external sources >> but also as a POST inputstream and/or request parameters. I tend to >> think that this is the cleanest solution. > > Not only that... but it seems to me that the HTMLGenerator already > does what you want. And even worse, it was me adding such > functionality a few months ago. I need holidays badly. :-) Isn't what > is provided already enough for your needs?
see my last message Thanks Guido
