Reinhard, There was a difference between Cocoon XMLForm and xmlform.org when I posted this question: What is the current status of Cocoon XMLForm? (see http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=105341585732055&w=2). It appeared that there was some differences between the two (see the Ivelin answer http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=105343592518678&w=2).
One difference is that in xmlform.org the tag syntax matches the latest W3C XForms draft and Cocoon XMLForm not. In Cocoon XMLForm you haven't all the W3C XForms tag available and you need to modify the stylesheet and maybe the XMLForm Transformer to have some design elements. Christopher Oliver posted a RT message (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=105389102015851&w=2) where he suggested to replace XMLForms with JXForms (from an Ivelin communication) incorporating features Ivelin added in his xmlform.org code for the 2.1 release. My question is: have you done this and incorporated this features from xmlform.org into the JXForm? Thanks Regards Sylvain -----Message d'origine----- De: Reinhard P�tz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: mercredi, 9. juillet 2003 14:43 �: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet: RE: Alternatives to XMLForm: what's the state of art? From: Sylvain Thevoz > Hello Reinhard, > > What are the advantages if I choose JXForms (Cocoon Control > Flow) instead of XMLForms (Action)? "Only" another type of controller. IMO it is more advanced than the XMLForm actions you have to write otherwise, easier to implement and maintain. > >We will do the changes (integration of JXForms into the > XMLForms block) > >the next days. > > About the form, do the changes include the match of the > latest XForms Candidate Release? Sorry, I'm not very familiar with the XForms specification. What are the differences? Cheers, Reinhard
