Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > I'd be more in favor of a new milestone, since the current discussion on > FOM is about APIs.
We agreed that we don't want to postpone the release because of the FOM :) So, I see two alternatives: a) if it's possible to define the contracts in the next, let's say 5 days, we wait. If not, we should add a good doc about this topic and make the release. > > Also, some discussion I had with "ReSTy" Marc about the flow led to some > thoughts that may impact the names of the underlying interfaces. Stay > tuned, a RT will come soon. > :) Carsten
