Adding to this, a lot of us are using multiple models from different providers depending on the task. A quality patch, even a small one, will take a dozen revisions. Larger ones are in the hundreds, thousands of you use reviewer panels with different settings, models and providers. A single patch could easily have half a dozen different models involved. I'm not sure what we gain either.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2026 at 7:43 AM Brandon Williams <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 2:30 PM Jordan West <[email protected]> wrote: > > * All LLM use must be attributed to both you and the harness, provider, > and model being used. The project makes no specific recommendations or > requirements regarding the toolchain used as long as the user has legal > access and provides attribution. > > I think recording this in every commit and thus making it publicly > available provides more negatives than positives. AI is both heavily > marketed and politicized, requiring this data be made available leaves > the project vulnerable to being used by either in the future, whatever > that brings. > > Kind Regards, > Brandon >
