+1

On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 8:54 AM Francisco Guerrero <[email protected]>
wrote:

> +1
>
> On 2026/09/29 15:52:39 Christopher Bradford wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > Christopher Bradford
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 11:18 AM Bernardo Botella <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > *From: *Josh McKenzie <[email protected]>
> > > *Date: *Tuesday, 29 September 2026 at 17:01
> > > *To: *dev <[email protected]>
> > > *Subject: *Re: [VOTE] CEP-66: Zero-copy SSTable splitting
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2026, at 9:40 AM, Maxim Muzafarov wrote:
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Tue, 29 Sept 2026 at 15:12, Abe Ratnofsky <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2026, at 6:16 AM, Brandon Williams wrote:
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > Kind Regards,
> > > > > Brandon
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 3:41 PM Chris Lohfink <
> [email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I'd like to call a vote on CEP-66: Zero-copy SSTable splitting.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The proposal splits eligible compressed SSTables by reusing their
> > > encoded compression chunks and rebuilding the child components,
> avoiding a
> > > row rewrite. It starts with an opt-in sstablesplit --zero-copy mode for
> > > split tool and BIG-format SSTables on Cassandra 7.0/trunk. Reflinks
> provide
> > > an additional optimization where supported; otherwise, Cassandra
> copies the
> > > encoded bytes. Follow-up incremental phases cover Spark support,
> > > anticompaction, BTI, 2i, and partial-range zero copy streaming.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The discussion covered the new SSTable format, compatibility,
> reflink
> > > complexity, and digest generation. The proposal and discussion are
> here:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Proposal:
> > > > >>
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/spaces/CASSANDRA/pages/451972773/draft+CEP-66+Zero-copy+SSTable+splitting
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Discussion:
> > > > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/sjqbv0m451kqopms8whymgwbrr2v16tw
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Please cast your vote in this thread. The vote will remain open
> for
> > > at least 72 hours, longer if needed. Per the CEP process, adoption
> requires
> > > three binding +1 votes and no binding vetoes.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > >> Chris
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to