+1, I'm really interested in the goals of this CEP and would like to help 
contribute in any way that I can (review, testing, etc.).

Thanks,
Andy

On Mon, Sep 28, 2026, at 8:40 PM, Chris Lohfink wrote:
> I'd like to call a vote on CEP-66: Zero-copy SSTable splitting.
>
> The proposal splits eligible compressed SSTables by reusing their 
> encoded compression chunks and rebuilding the child components, 
> avoiding a row rewrite. It starts with an opt-in sstablesplit 
> --zero-copy mode for split tool and BIG-format SSTables on Cassandra 
> 7.0/trunk. Reflinks provide an additional optimization where supported; 
> otherwise, Cassandra copies the encoded bytes. Follow-up incremental 
> phases cover Spark support, anticompaction, BTI, 2i, and partial-range 
> zero copy streaming.
>
> The discussion covered the new SSTable format, compatibility, reflink 
> complexity, and digest generation. The proposal and discussion are here:
>
> Proposal:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/spaces/CASSANDRA/pages/451972773/draft+CEP-66+Zero-copy+SSTable+splitting
>  
>
> Discussion:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/sjqbv0m451kqopms8whymgwbrr2v16tw 
>
> Please cast your vote in this thread. The vote will remain open for at 
> least 72 hours, longer if needed. Per the CEP process, adoption 
> requires three binding +1 votes and no binding vetoes.
>
> Thanks,
> Chris

Reply via email to