Option 1 sounds like the right way to go. On Jun 11, 2026 at 6:37:57 AM, Josh McKenzie <[email protected]> wrote:
> 1. Create a short "Reporting bugs" page — how to file a JIRA, what info > to include, where to ask first if you're not sure it's a bug. > > Want to make sure we call out the whole "you have to sign up to JIRA to > participate" bit too while we're at it. > > +1 on option 1 as well. > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2026, at 10:07 PM, Bernardo Botella wrote: > > +1 on option 1. > > Thanks Patrick for pouring some love here! > > El El jue, 11 jun 2026 a las 9:38 a. m., Patrick McFadin < > [email protected]> escribió: > > Hey everyone, > > As part of the docs modernization work (CASSANDRA-21314), we've been burning > down the broken links that are blocking the Antora 3 upgrade > (CASSANDRA-21315). The bulk of that landed under CASSANDRA-21342 and is now > fixed across all release branches. What's left is a small pile of links > where the fix is a content decision, not a retarget. I summarized it in > CASSANDRA-21449, and one of them is worth a quick discussion here because > it changes site navigation. > The website nav and front page both link to a bugs.adoc page that doesn't > exist and, as far as git history shows, never has. Under Antora 2, it just > renders as a dead link, but Antora 3 with strict error checking will fail > the build on it, so we have to do something. > > To see it, go to https://cassandra.apache.org/doc/latest/index.html and > try to click on "How to report bugs" > > Three options: > 1. Create a short "Reporting bugs" page — how to file a JIRA, what info > to include, where to ask first if you're not sure it's a bug. > 2. Replace the nav entry with a direct external link to the Cassandra > JIRA project. > 3. Drop the entry entirely, the community page already covers how to reach > us. > > My vote is option 1. A small page costs us almost nothing to maintain and > gives us a place to say "check the user list or #cassandra first," which > probably saves a few duplicate JIRAs a year. I can create it. > The rest of the 21449 items are in-tree doc links (example tables that > were never written, a couple of pages that don't exist yet) and I'll just > document those decisions on the ticket. Speak up there if you care about > any of them. > > If there are no objections within a few days, I'll proceed with the new > page and open a PR. > Thanks, > Patrick > > >
